The Lawrenceville and Westminster
Chapters of the Rider Student Union and the Student Chapter of the Coalition
to Save Westminster Choir College in Princeton are committed to transparency,
and the sharing of all information regarding the proposed closing of the
Westminster Choir College Princeton campus and
the affects it has on the students as well as the school as a whole. We find
the actions and the recent email response by the Westminster’s SGA to be
inappropriate and unprofessional in the current situation. They made no moves
to engage The Coalition to Save Westminster in Princeton about any possible
stances on the subject, sent no emails and made no connection to keep us in the
loop with administration. Rather they went onward and went along with
administration in promoting this "study" of closing Westminster. Also we are unaware of any attempt by
the SGA to seek guidance from the Rider AAUP in its assessment of the current
situation.
There has been no vocal opposition to this move by SGA. Why
do they fall silent and release an email vaguely justifying the move with Dell
'Omo thinking about it? As of right now, the SGA has been vocally silent,
offering no opposition to this
move which leads us at the Coalition to suspect they are for the closing. When will
they go against administration and realize what their silence has already done?
There has also been no written or vocal statement by Dell 'Omo
himself, instead he speaks through the SGA or through a third party, The Coalition would like for Dell 'Omo
to address Westminster with his concerns, instead of saying through an SGA email
that you are thinking about our concerns. We have no way of knowing if Dell 'Omo will
share his concerns about the closing with the team conducting the survey. We
also have no idea in what way he will address his issues to the Westminster
student body as well as faculty. We would like full transparency when it comes
to the delivery of his statement. We would also like to feel secured in his
statement, because we as the Coalition understand that written word and also
spoken word is not always a promise.
We would also like access to the concerns posed by SGA to Dell
'Omo and Dean Shaftel. Were the SGA's concerns in writing? We would like access to all current information
or stances that SGA or Dell 'Omo have. We would also like information as to the
concerns posed by SGA, if they were on an individual basis or if they were
posed as a group. This can change the view points and can lead to unity in the
schools concerns. We would also like to pinpoint the opposing views that SGA
had, if any, because they have failed to mention any actual opposition to the move. The SGA needs to represent the
students by opposing the move and not the administration – by soft selling it –
as it is currently doing.
SGA continues to show its agreement to the move, by posing
positive aspects of the move and that no position will be posed until the study
is done. We would like to know how they are so certain that these are benefits
to the point that they have put them into a school wide email. We would like
strong evidence available to everyone that they do not have any more
information than the students. We would also like for administration to
show us any or all communications with SGA and proof to the student body that
they have not been given any information regarding so called benefits to the
closing of Westminster. Are they aware of the costs of building state of the
art music facilities for more than 300 musicians ranging from singers to
organists? Are they aware of the numbers and the budget they will have to have?
Were the savings that SGA mentioned tallied up against the costly construction that would have to be funded? SGA
as well as Dell 'Omo have said the process will take several years, but have
failed to mention pinpoint times and an accurate timeline of the shut down and
movement of Westminster. Did Dell Omo state that 2017-2018 year will not be
affected? What about 2018-19? If he has made no such commitment it
is disingenuous for the SGA to imply as much.
If they have made a position such as this, it is correct to assume they have
thought of a clear timeline of events as well. They also failed to mention in
what way Westminster will function as a college as the sale of our land is
being negotiated. Will we continue to be a functioning college or will
Westminster begin our transition as soon as a land
sale deal has been made?
Will the sale of
Westminster be more important than the functioning of our college, and will we begin
to see our college turn into a bidding ground for buyers and sellers? Why has
SGA and Dell 'Omo failed to portray a clear timeline and dates for such a move? SGA's email also
mentioned staying positive and respectful. They failed to mention that being
quiet and not opposing the move is not respectful, it is passive. We as the
Coalition will not be passive when Dell 'Omo wants to move our college
SGA has made clear in their response that being positive means to
not go against the move, and that is wrong. You can be positive about opposing
a bad plan. We as the students of Westminster must show Dell 'Omo that his plan
has too many holes and we are
unified in opposition. It is the role of SGA to talk for the students, not administration. It is not the role of SGA to undermine
those who are speaking up and fighting for the college they love. Boost up your
love for Westminster; do not undermine those who choose to speak up. The reference by SGA to unnamed
individuals that are addressing the issue as “uninformed” is exactly the kind
of negativity that the SGA is supposedly telling us to avoid. It is a
smear of the opposition and thus the student body.
SGA also mentions to stay well informed and to
not believe everything we read. The whole email is strands of statements
without any actual facts or proof to back up any claims you are trying to
make. SGA is talking on behalf of administration. We have seen even less
proof of dire financial information, and the administration has not released
specific data supporting their financial analysis and the need to shutter
Westminster Choir College Princeton Campus. They have jumped to the nuclear option of shuttering our beloved Princeton campus
without showing us any other options with complete openness and honest facts.
In the SGA’s list of options that students can
take, nowhere does it say to oppose the move, or make your voice known that you
are vocally against the move. SGA
has routinely throughout this email portrayed resistance to opposing the move,
and by listing what students should do and failing to include raising your
voice and opposing the move, you have undermined what it means to be a Westminster
student. SGA has shown us with this small list that they are much more inclined
to have us continue the path of ignorance
and not grab the bull by the
horns. SGA needs to stop telling our students be subdued in the face of a grave
mistake.
SGA's job is to speak for the students of Westminster. They
along with all the other students and faculty know of the opposition supported
by the students and failed to show and give support to those who speak against
the move. Rather, they offer soft passive options, saying why Westminster is
great and lovely, instead of hitting home with actual changes. SGA needs to
start representing the school and all of its students, and has to stop
delivering to the school a soft sell of the move, and the idea that it is ok if
we just think positive. Speak up and make noise, and do not feel as though SGA
is the voice of the people when they cannot even break away from administration in the face of this administration
imposed crisis for our beloved college and campus.
SGA is hosting a forum, and has failed to present any clear
information on who the presenters will be. Will
AAUP be invited to present? Alumni? Save Westminster
Coalition? Rider Students Union Westminster representatives?
Or will it be another administration platform to promote its Study
/ Move process? They have continuously failed to bring to the table any
facts or information on all of the claims they have made, and they wrap up with
another vague statement.
SGA, you need to start being the voice of the students, and not
the talking head of administration. If you cannot do this, then you are not the
voice of Westminster, we are. Westminster is here to stay, and I will not be
quiet when it comes to the closing of the place that has touched lives across
land and time.
We call upon the SGA to convene immediately and to pass a resolution that:
* opposes the move unconditionally
* vows to do everything in its power to halt the move
* commits to communicate to everyone its commitment to use its powers to stop
the move directly to President Dell Omo and the Board of Trustees.
* Allocates no less than $10,000 of student fees to the student efforts to
block the move.
Do not go gentle into that good night,
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
Though wise men at their end know dark is right,
Because their words had forked no lightning they
Do not go gentle into that good night.